Classification and Labelling
Classification and Labelling of some phthalates for
reproductive effects
Three phthalates, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), di-n-butyl
phthalate (DBP) and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP) are classified in
the European Union as reproductive toxicants.
Chemicals that are classified in this way means that they are
potentially hazardous if not used carefully. But it does not
necessarily mean they pose a risk. Indeed, scientific risk
assessments on all three of these phthalates have shown there is no
risk to the general population from any of these substances
under normal use.
In March 2001, the European Commission adopted a proposal by the
Classification and Labelling Committee to classify DEHP as a
category 2 reproductive toxicant for both fertility and
developmental effects. Similarly it decided that DBP should be
classified as a reproductive toxicant in category 2 for
developmental effects and category 3 for fertility
effects.
The necessary amendments to the Dangerous Substances Directive
were agreed on August 7, 2001 and published in the Official Journal
of the European Community on August 21. The directive required that
the new labelling be introduced by no later than July 30, 2002.
BBP was clasified as category 2 for
developmental effects, category 3 for fertility
effects and as dangerous to the environment in June 2004.
As a result of the classifications, containers and preparations
containing 0.5% or more DBP, DEHP and BBP now have to
carry a label with the skull and crossbones symbol and the
appropriate risk phrases. There is no requirement to label finished
articles such as PVC flooring, leathercloth etc.
It is important to note that these labelling changes are not the
result of new information regarding the toxicology of phthalates
but because, under the EU Council Regulation 793/93, data on the
potential hazards of a substance have to be passed on to the
Classification and Labelling Committee at the time that a substance
is being risk assessed.
The Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC specifies the
hazard classification, packaging and labelling requirements for
dangerous substances based on their intrinsic properties. The aim
being to ensure that users and handlers take appropriate
measures.
Due to evidence from scientific studies, ECPI members had been
labelling DEHP and DBP as toxic to reproduction, category 3, since
1994. Both substances therefore already carried the St Andrew's
Cross and so the changes in working practices required by the
change to category 2 will not be great.
It is also important to remember that :
- The classification and labelling system is based on existing
data found only in high concentration studies on animals and
describes the inherent properties of the chemical substance. The
properties of a substance should not be mistaken for actual risk,
which depends on what you do with a substance and how you handle
it. Labelling sets the frame for good working practices and
suitable protection measures. It may still be used safely in the
work place and any risks associated with its use will be assessed
on the basis of hazard and exposure in the usual manner.
- Articles made of flexible PVC or some other polymer, containing
these phthalates, should not be labelled and their sale is not
restricted.
- ECPI believes that granules of PVC compound are virtually fully
processed and do not need to be labelled but they should be
accompanied by a safety data sheet because they may be heated,
extruded, reshaped etc. However these activities are all carried
out by professionals - the general public is not involved.
- Plastisols are not processed, hence in our view they are
preparations. They are normally only sold to professional users who
convert them into finished PVC articles. We do not know of any
situations where plastisols are sold to the public.
- Adhesives, paints, and printing inks, etc containing these
phthalates are preparations and thus may not be sold to the general
public. However, they may be sold to professionals.
For more details on classification and labelling please refer to
the following sources:
|